SATAVAHANA ACHIEVEMENTS
The government if the Satavahana kingdom was organized on the
traditional lines. The kingdom was divided into Janapadas, which were
further sub-divided into aharas. Each ahara was under an Amataya.
The basic unit of the ahara was the grama with the village headman
called gamika. Central control was maintained over the provices.
Princes were generally made viceroys. And the kings did not assume
high-sounding titles. They were expected to maintain dharma.
Taxation was not burden some. The state derived its income from
crown lands, court fees, fines and ordinary taxes on lands. The
extraordinary taxes of the Mauryan period were not imposed. In
general, Central control was not high because feudal traits emerged in
the Satavahana period. The feudal chiefs like maharathas
mahasenapatis and mahabhojas issued their own coins.
The area under the satavahanas in general witnessed considerable
prosperity. There was brisk trade. Broach was the most important port
and it had a vast and rich hinterland. Pratishthana produced cotton
cloth. Tagara and Ujjain produced muslin. The chief imports were
wines, copper, tin, lead and gold and silver coins. Another important
port was kalyan mentioned in the Perilus. The other ports were
Sopara, Goa and pigeon islands. Within the kingdom there were
important cities like Tagara, Prathishthana, Nasik, Junnar and
Dhanyakataka. Koddura and Chinnaganjam were the important ports
on the east. The general life led by the people was similar to the one
portrayed in Vatsayana's Kama-Sutra.
Evidence also shows that a good number of people emigrated from the
Deccan to colonize the regions in South-East Asia
The Satavahanas and Shiva were worshiped. Saptasataka reveals the
worship of many Hindu deities. Vaishnavasim and Shavism grew
popular. Gautamiputra-Satakarni claimed himself to be the protector
of brahmins. The Naisk prasasthi states that Varnashrama Dharmawas
maintained.
Be great in act, as you have been in thought. Page 30 of 56
Buddhism too was popular. Both the sakas and Satavahanas
encouraged Buddhism. Ushavadata mare several grants to Buddhist
monks. Some of these grants were renewed by Guatamiputra
Satakarni. Buddhist momuments and stupas came into existence at
Nasik, Vidisa, Bhattiprolu, Goli, Ghantasala and Amaravati. It was at
the last plece that most probably human figures were carved out for
the first time. And the stupa at this place had a marble railing with
relief sculptures. A vaijayanti merchant was responsible for enriching
Karle and Kanheri Buddhist caves. Merchants from Nasik contributed
to the caves at Vidisa and Bharhut. In brief cave architecture and
building of stupas witnessed certain development under the auspices
of the satavahanas; and the donations or the merchants belonging to
the guilds prove the commercial prosperity of the area.
Emcouraged by wealth the kings patronized literature and architecture.
Hala was an authority on the Puranas. He was the author of Sapta-
Sataka. It is said that Hala paid as much as 40 million pieces of gold
for four kavyas. Leelavati deals with the military campaigns of Hala.
The kings encouraged architecture. The five gateways at Sanchi the
rock-cut Chaity-halls of Bhaja, Karle, Nasik and Kanheri and the stupas
at Amaravati, Bhattiprolu, Goli and Ghantasala were built in this
period. The capitals of the pillars in Karle caves are elaborately
sculptured. The dome and the base of the Amaravati stupa is
elaborately sculptured. Jataka stories were incised on marble slabs.
The upper part of the dome is a beautiful floral design. It is generally
said that its construction began during the t8ime of Gautamiputra
Satakarni and was completed during the time of Yajna Sri Satakarni.
Most probably two Ajanta Frescoes (9th and 10th) came into existence
during this period.
The satavahanas weregreat excavators of cave temples and the
magnificent temples of Ellora and Ajanta were the continuation of the
Satavahana tradition to which all Middle Indian dynasties in succeeding
ages claimed historic relationship. The basic tradition in Middle India is
of the Satavahana empire. As in the north it is of the Mauryan. From
the point of view of historic continuity it is important to remember this
primary fact as up to quite recent times the traditions flowing from the
satavahanas were living factors in Indian history.
Be great in act, as you have been in thought. Page 31 of 56
Significance Of The Satavahanas
(1) It was the emergence of Vakataka power in the Vindhya area some
where about the middle of the third century that brought about the
downfall of the Satavahanas. But an empire so firely established in its
home domains does not break down with the fall of a dynasty. The
Rastrakutas and the Chalukyas in the Godavari valley and the Pallavas
in the south originally the viceroys of the Satavahanas, claimed
successtion to the empire with in their own territorial limits as the
Vakatakas claimed it to the north of the Vindhyas. The Gangas and the
Kadambas were also the inheritors of the tradition and as the
Vijayanagar emperors claimed in time to be Chalukya Chudamanis, or
the crest jewels of the Chalukya dynasty and as the great kings of
Gujarat equally claimed succession from the Chalukyas, the imperial
tradition of the Satavahanas may be said to have been carried forward
at least to the beginning of the seventeenth century.
(2) The rise of the Satavahanas signified that the economic revolution
of the Gangetic region was repeated allover India. Added to this
because of the peculiar geographical terrain of the Deccan peninsula a
number of small kingdoms came into existence but not any big empire.
(3) Since the Satavahanas had controlled part of the Deccan and part
of northern India, they acted as the couriers of Aryanism to southern
India.
(4) It is intriguing to note that the Satavahana inscriptions were
primarily in pali but not in Sanskrit indicating it look long time to
establish Sanskrit language as the language of the elite although
people professed Aryanism much earlier.
(5) The administrative structure of the Satavahana is a revealing one
because it was not a highly centralized administration and it conceded
the emergence of feudalism. Feudal chiefs like Mahara this
mahasenapatis and mahabhojas issued their own coins.
(6) The artistic excellence that was achieved under the aegis of the
Satavahanas had a tremendous significance. Buddhist mouments came
into existence at Nasik, Vidisha, Bhattiprolu, Goli, Ghantasala and
amaravati. Most probably human figure was first carved out at
Amaravati and Amaravati's sculptures influenced South-east Asian
sculptures.
Be great in act, as you have been in thought. Page 32 of 56
(7) Under the aegis of the Satavahanas trade was given a boost. The
important pores were Koddura and Chinnaganjam on the east and
Kalyan, Sopara, Goa and Pigeon islands on the West coast. And some
of the important commercial centers were Tagara, Pratishthana, Nasik,
Junnar and Dhanyakataka.
Saka-satavahana Conflict
1. There is controversy about the name 'Sakas'. Some hold the view
that they were probably. One branch of them was known as
kshabaratas. Some say Nahapana was a pahlava and Ghasmotika the
father of Chashtana was Scythian. It was from the Gupta period that
the name 'saka' came to be applied to this family of people.
2. The one reason that was responsible for the southward thrust of the
sakas was the Kushan pressure from the north.
3. To begin with they established themselves in western Rajputana,
Gujarat and Kathiawad. Then they took malva and even northern
Maharashtra from the Satavahanas. At one time they even got
southern Maharashtra as far as Vijayanti from the Satavahanas.
4. The earliest known king of the Kshaharatas, a branch of the Sakas,
was Bhumaka. He ruled over Gujarat, Kathiawad and north
Konkancoins belonging to him are found.
5. His successor was Nahapana-title Raja-numerous coins-advanced at
the expense of Satavahanas-this advance began five years before the
end of Nahapana's rule. After Nahapana defeated the Satavahana he
assumed the title of Maha Kshatrapa. A Jaina work mentions Broach as
the capital of Nahapana.
6. Ushavadata was the general and son-in-law of Nahapana and he
succeeded him as the Saka ruler. He took western deccan including
Malva. It is not known whether Paithan, the capital of Satavahanas
was lost or not. He defeated Satavahana rulers were Sundara
Satakarni, Chakora Satakarni and Siva sati.
It is interesting to note that Ushavadata following Puranic Hinduism
gve cows to brahmins - visited Pushiar - gave religious benefactions -
Be great in act, as you have been in thought. Page 33 of 56
also gave viallages to Buddhists - Saka country was divided into
districts.
7. It was Gautamiputra Satakarni who revived the glories of
Satavahanas. He defeated the successor of Nahapana, Ushavadata
was killed. Some say that he defeated Nahapana. Also a Jaina work
speaks of Nahapana's defeat and death at the hands of Satavahanas.
The coins of Nahapana were re-issued by Gautamiputra Satakarni.
Some land grants also confirm this victory. It is said that the
Satavahana king made preparations for 16 years to defeat the Sakas.
8. The coflict was re-opened during the days of Pulumayi II, the king
after Gautamiputra Satakarni, as well as, Sri Pulumayi.
9. After this Ghamotika appeared on the stage who ruled over
Kathiwad. His successor, Ghashtana also infliceted defeats on the
Satavahanas. Rudraman too defeated the Satavahanas. The victory of
Rudraman and Ghastana around 150 A.D. (cofirmed by Junagarh
inscription) mad the Patavahanas lose all their northern conquests.
Significance:-
(1) The conflict between the Sakas and Satavahanas was inevitable as
such conflicts were natural in feudal times. Probably the Sakas were
perforce dieven to expand southward because of the establishment of
Kushan empire. The Saka-Satavahana conflict was because of the
basic factors working in the political dynamic of the day.
(2) The Sakas issued coins of great artistic value. Gatuamiputra
Satakarni re-issued the coins of Nahapana. In other words, the Sakas
had a better artistic sense.
(3) Evidence shows that the Sakas introduced new ideas and
institutions in south-silver coins, free use of Sanskrit and Vigorour
patronage of Buddhists and brahmins. Kshaharatas used Khoreshthi -
alphabet of extreme north-west.
Be great in act, as you have been in thought. Page 34 of 56
Sanskrit
Sanskrit is a remote cousin of all the language of Europe ecepting the
Finnish, Hungarian, Turkish and basqe. Around 2000 B.C. an ancestral
group of dialects arose among the tribesmen of South Russia.
With Panini (probably 4th century B.C.) the Sanskrit language reached
its classical form. It developed a little thense forward except in its
vocabulary. The grammer of Panini, Asthadhyayi, pre-supposes the
work of may earlier grammarians. Latter grammars are mostly
commentaries on Panini, the chief being Mahabashya by Patanjali
(second century B.C.) and the Banaras-commentary of Jayaditya and
Vamana (seventh century A.D.).
It was from the time of Panini onwards that the language began to be
called Samskarta, perfected or refined, as opposed to Prakras
(natural), the popular dialects which had grown over time. In all
probability, Panini bsed his work on the languages as it was spoken in
the north west. Beginning as the lingua franca of the priestly class, it
gradually became that of the governing class also. The first important
dynasty to use Sanskrit was that of the Sakas of Ujjain and the
inscriptions of Rudraman at Girnar. Otherwise, the Maurya and the
other important dynasty till the Guptas used Prakrit for their official
pronouncements.
The Language of the Rig Veda was already archaic when the hymns
were composed and the ordinary Aryan spoke a sompler tongue, moer
closely akin to classical Sanskrit. By the time of the Buddha themasses
were speaking languages which were much simpler than Sanskrit.
These were the prakrits. The ordinary speech of Ancient India has
been preserved forus largely throughthe unorthodox religions. Most
inscriptions of pre-Gupta time are in Prakrit. The women and humbler
characters of the Sanskrit drama are made to speak in formalized
prakrit of various dialects. A few of secular literary works were
composed in Prakrit.
Classical Sanksrit increasing became thelanguage of brahmins and the
learned few. Its use was restricted to certainoccasions such as issuing
of proclamations and during the performance of Vedic ceremonies. In
the towns and villages a popular form of Sanksrit, known as Prakrit,
came into the existence. There were a breat number of local
variations. The chief western variety was called Shuraseni and the
eastern variety, Magadhi, Pali was another popular language based on
Be great in act, as you have been in thought. Page 35 of 56
Sanksrit. It, too, was used in the same religions as Prakrit. The
Buddha, to reach more people, taught in Magadhi.
Speaking of literature, the four Vedas and the Brahmins and
Upnishadas have some literary qualities. Some hymns of the Rig Veda
and some parts of the early Upnishadas have some merit. Otherwise,
they are mostly dry and monotonous.
In the 1028 hymns of the Rig Veda there is a great variety of styled
and merit. The hymns contain many repetitions and the majority of
them have the sameness of outlook. A number of hymns show
deployment feeling for nature, as for example, the hymns to Ushas. A
few vedic hymns are primarily secular, as for example the Gamester's
Lament.
Very tittle of liverary quality is there in the later Vedic literature the
Atherva veda mostly a monotonous collection contains a few poems of
great merit. The prose Brahmanas, though written in simple and
straight forward language have little literary merit.
Thus the earliest Indian literature is to be found in the Mahabharata
and the Ramayana. The Mahabharata consisting of 90,00 stanzas, is
probably the longest single poem in the world's literature. Ignoring the
interpolations, the style of the Mahabharata is direct and vivid though
consisting of repeated clinches and stock epithets, typical of epic
literature every where. The chief characters are delineated in a very
simple outline but with an individuality which makes them real
persons.
The other epic Ramayana also contains interpolations but they are
much briefer and are mostly didactic. The main body of the poem
gives the impression of being the work of one author whose style was
based on that of the other epic to show some kinship to that of
classical Sanskrit poetry. The style of the Ramayana is less rugged
than that of the Mahabharata. It is a work of greater art and it
contains many dramatic passages and beautiful descriptive writing.
The earliect surviving Sanskrit poetry is that of the Buddhist writer
Ashvaghosa who probably lived in the Ist century A.D. He composed
the Buddha-Charitra in a comparatively simple classical style. The
Girnar inscription of Rudradaman, dated 150 A.D. is the earliest
surviving example of Sanskrit prose.
Be great in act, as you have been in thought. Page 36 of 56
The earliest surviving prose stories are a few narrative episodes in the
Brahmanas followed by the pali Jatakas. It was in the Gupta period
that ornate Sanskrit prose was developed. The chief writers in this
style were Dandin, Subandhu and Bana.
Prakrit
Chronologically pali is the first Sanskrit language and various Prakrits
oppeared later. Even the meaning of the word 'Pali' underwent
changes. In the final stages the word "Pali" meant language of the
texts of Theravada Buddhism. The Tripitaka meaning three baskets are
books which consist of the canons of the Theravada sect. One part of it
deals with the monastic discipline. The second part lays down
principles of Buddhism. And the last part deals with various subjects
like ethics psychology theories of knowledge and metaphysical
problems.
Besides the canonical literature, there was also non-canomical
literature in pali. In pali liberature the earlieat works relate to the
Jataka stories. The early poetry consisted of a few verses from the
songs of the older monks and Nuns, a collection of poems ascribed
wrongly to the great disciples of the Buddha in the early days of the
order. The style of these is simpler then Sanskrit literature and
suggests influence of popular song. The book milinda panda is the
most important one. Its subject matter is the dialogue between Milinda
and monk Nagasena over some problems of the Buddhist faith. This
particular kind of canonical literature in pali was practised in Ceylon
also. The classical works Depavamsa and Mahavamsa, the two great
chronicles of Ceylon and also some grammatical metrical and
lexicographical texts were written in pali.
Now for the word "Prakrit". It stands for all the middle Indo-Aryan
speeches which belong to an era between Sanskrit on the one hand
and Aryan languages it has sectarian value since it was exclusively
used as the speech of the Hinayana Buddhism.
From the earliest times to the first century A.D. inscriptions were
composed exclusively in Prakrit. Asoka left behind 30 inscriptions in
Prakrit. Even in literature prakrit came to be used particularly in plays.
And prakrit itself consists of different dialects. There were several
other prakrits of lesser importance. By the time of the Guptas the
prakrits were standardized and had lost their local character. The
vernaculars had already developed beyond them. What panini did for
Be great in act, as you have been in thought. Page 37 of 56
Sanskrit others did dor the Prakrits and they began to resemble more
the languages actually were based on the conventions of dramatic
theory and they never represented popular life. Now did they reflect in
any way the linguistic conditions of society. Some plays are composed
exclusively in Prakrit and they are technically called sttakas. The
Karpuramanjari (about 900 A.D.) Rajasekhara depicting love between
man and woman is the most important work of this type.
Continuting the secular aspect of Prakrit language a number of stanzas
were written both on love and maxims. The most remarkable amongst
such texts is the Gatha Saptasati of Hala one of the Satavahana rulers.
This book consists of 700 stanzas about love depicting the varied
phases of South Indian rural life. The king probably ruled in the Ist
century A.D. The poems are notable for their consciseness and for
their great economy of words and masterly use of suggestions. Some
poems contain simple and natural descriptions and references to the
lives of peasants and the lower class. More important is the fact that
narrative literature and epic poems are fairly extensive in Prakrit. The
most noteworthy among themare the Brihatkatha of Gunadhya
composed in Paisachi dialect and Setubandha of Pravarasena.
Apart from secular literature prakrit was used for religious literature
also like the Jaina canonical works. It was during the 5th century A.D.
that most of the Jaina canons were written down. In prakrit literature
the Jaina writings have very little literary the poetry of the Jainas is
better than prose. Its poetry is written in lively vernacular style.
Furthermore it is to be stated here that scholars treated Apabhramas
as a kind of Prakrit. It boasts of extensive literature particularly
narrative stories. The first writer to make use of it was Asvaghosa. The
others who followed the example were Bhasa (3rd century A.D.) and
later Visakhadatta and kalidasa.
In the Apabhramsa the meter doha was adopted as powerful form of
expression of religious and philosophical thoughts. Both Jaina monks
and contemporary writers of Tantrik Bhddhism utilized this meter.
Incidentally stray poems dealing with morals maxims ethics religious
discourses and legenos were commonly written in Apabhramsa. Among
the Jains the columinous texts on the life and activities of Jaina heroes
were written in Apabhramsa. It may be noted here in the end that
Apabhramsa, Sanskrit and Prakrit had a great influence both on
Gujarati and Hindi as late as the 16th century.
Be great in act, as you have been in thought. Page 38 of 56
Futhermore Prakrit is of linguistic importance since it is illustrative of
the linguistic evolution from Prakrit to Apabhramsa and finally to a new
regional language. Apabhramsa meaning falling down was a corrupt
form of Prakrit dialect. It is believed to have originated in the northwest
and traveled from that region along with the migrant people who
scattered and settled incentral and western India after the Huna
invasions. The Prakrit as used by Jains was greatly influenced by
Apabhramsa. It is here that the link between the older and the new
languages of Maharashtri and Gujarati is evident.
India's Impact on Southeast Asia
Causes and Consequences
The transmission of Indian culture of distant parts of Central Asia,
China, Japan, and especially Southeast Asia is certainly one of the
greatest achievements of Indian history or even of the history of
mankind. None of the other great civilizations - not even the Hellenic -
had been able to achieve a similar success without military conquest.
In this brief survey of India's history, there is no room for an adequate
discussion of the development of the 'Indianised' states of Southeast
Asia which can boast of such magnificent temple cities as Pagan
(Burma; constructed from 1044 to 1287 AD,) Angkor (Combodia;
constructed from 889 to c. 1300 AD), and the Borobudur (Java, early
ninth century AD). Though they were influenced by Indian culture,
they are nevertheless part and parcel of the history of those respective
countries. Here we will limit our observations to some fundamental
problems oncerning the transmission of Indian culture to the vast
region of Sotheast Asia.
Who Spread Indian Culture in Southeast Asia ?
Historians have formulated several theories regarding the transmission
of Indian culture of Southeast Asia :
(1) the 'Kshatriya' theory;
(2) the 'Vaishya' theory;
(3) the 'Brahmin' theory.
The Kshatriya theory states that Indian warriors colonized Southeast
Asia; this proposition has now been rejected by most scholars
although it was very prominent some time ago.
Be great in act, as you have been in thought. Page 39 of 56
The Vaishya theory attributes the spread of Indian cultura to traders;
it is certainly much more plausible than the Kshatriya theory, but does
not seem to explain the large number of Sanskrit loan words in
Southeast Asian languages.
The Brahmin hypothesis credits Brahmins with the transmission of
Indian culture; this would account for the prevalence of these
loanawards; but may have to be amplified by some reference to the
Buddhists as well as to be amplified by some reference to the
Buddhsits as well as to the traders. We shall return to these theories,
but first we shall try to understand the rise and fall of the Kshatriya
theory.
It owed its origin to the Indian freedom movement. Indian historians,
smarting under the stigma of their own colonical sujection, tried to
compensate for this by showing that al leat in ancient times Indians
had been strong enough to establish colonise of their own. In 1926 the
Greater India society was established in Calcutta and in subsequent
years the renewed Indian historia R.C. Majumdar published his series
of studies, Ancient Indian colonise in the Far East. This school held
that Indian kings and warriors had established such colonise and the
Sanksrit names of South east Asian rulers seemed to provide ample
supporting evidence. At least this hypothesis stimulated further
research, though it also alienated those intellectuals of Southeast Asia
who rejected the idea of having once been colonized by a 'Greater
India'. As research progressed it was found that there was vary little
proof of any direct Indian political influence in those states of
Southeast Asia. Furthermore, it was demonstrated that Southeast
Asian rulers had adopted Sanskrit names the mselves - thus such
names could not be adduced as evidence for the presence of Indian
kings.
The Vaishya theory, in contrast, emphasized a much more important
element of the Indian connection with Southeast Asia. Trade had
indeed been the driving force behind all these early contacts.
Inscriptions also showed that guids of Indian merchants had
established outposts in many parts of Southeast Asia. Some of their
inscriptions were written in languages such as Tamil. However, if such
merchants had been the chief agents of the transmission of Indian
culture, then all their languages should have made an impact on those
of Southeast Asia. But this was not so : Sanskrit and, to some extent,
languages. The traders certainly provided an important transmission
belt for all kinds of cultural influences. Nevertheless, they did not play
Be great in act, as you have been in thought. Page 40 of 56
the crucial role which some scholars have attributed to them. One of
the most important arguments against the Vaishya theory is that some
of the earliest traces of Indianised states in Southeast Asia are not
found in the coastalareas usually frequented by the traders, but in
mountainous, interior areas.
The Brahmin theory is in keeping with what we have shown with
regard to the almost contemporary spread of Hindu culture in
Southern and Central India. There Brahmins and Buddhist and Jain
monks played the major role in transmitting cultural values and
symbols, and in disseminating the style of Hundu kingship. In addition
to being religious specialists, the Brahmins also knew the Sanskrit
codes regarding law (dharmasastra), the art of government
(arthasastra), and art and architecture (silpasastra). They could taus
serve as development planners' in many different fields and were
accordingly welcome to Southeast Asian rulers who may have just
emerged from what we earlier described as first-and second phase
state formation.
No comments:
Post a Comment